I seem to be hearing the words "no contact" everywhere lately.

I hear them from parents I work with. I see them in estranged-parent communities. And increasingly, I see adult-child estrangement being discussed in mainstream media.

Oprah recently devoted an entire podcast episode to family estrangement and the decision to go no contact. The New Yorker asked why so many people are going "no contact" with their parents. And a recent HuffPost essay responding to Oprah's conversation argued passionately that sometimes estrangement isn't the problem at all—it's the solution someone chooses when a relationship has become too painful.

There are strong opinions on every side.

But I'm not particularly interested in choosing a side.

I'm interested in what we can learn from what's happening.

Because when an adult child stops speaking to a parent, our instinct is understandably to focus on the cutoff itself:

How do I get my child to talk to me again?

But I wonder if there's a different question worth asking first:

What is the no contact trying to tell us?

Family Estrangement Is More Common Than Many People Realize

For a long time, family estrangement was something people didn't talk about.

That's changing.

Cornell sociologist Karl Pillemer conducted a national survey of more than 1,300 Americans and found that 27% reported being estranged from a family member. Ten percent specifically reported estrangement from a parent or child.

Psychologist Joshua Coleman, author of Rules of Estrangement: Why Adult Children Cut Ties and How to Heal the Conflict, has become one of the most prominent voices on parent-adult child estrangement.

Coleman argues that something significant has changed in how we think about family.

For previous generations, family relationships were often organized around obligation:

Respect your parents.

Honor your mother and father.

Family comes first.

You don't walk away from family.

Today, many young adults have grown up hearing a different set of messages:

Protect your mental health.

Set boundaries.

Speak up when something hurts.

You don't have to remain in a relationship simply because someone is family.

Neither set of beliefs by itself explains why an adult child goes no contact.

But imagine what happens when those two ways of understanding family collide.

One person may experience no contact as an act of self-protection.

The other may experience that exact same cutoff as abandonment.

And both may genuinely believe their interpretation of the relationship is the correct one.

Two Things Can Be True

This may be one of the hardest ideas for parents and adult children to hold.

A parent can have loved their child deeply, sacrificed for them and genuinely tried to be a good parent.

And their adult child can still have experienced parts of the relationship as painful.

One truth doesn't automatically erase the other.

This came up repeatedly in Oprah's discussion. Families can hold very different realities about the same experiences.

I think that's critical.

Because when someone tells us they were hurt by something we did, our natural instinct is often to explain our intention:

That's not what I meant.

That's not how it happened.

I was only trying to help.

You know how much I love you.

Those things may all be true.

But intention and impact aren't always the same thing.

Understanding your adult child's experience doesn't require agreeing with every interpretation of the past.

And it certainly doesn't require accepting responsibility for everything that has gone wrong.

Understanding is not the same thing as accepting all the blame.

It is simply curiosity replacing defensiveness.

And curiosity gives us somewhere to go.

Have We Changed the Definition of Harm?

This is where the current conversation about no contact becomes particularly interesting.

Coleman has argued that our culture has significantly expanded its definition of what constitutes harm in families.

He's not entirely wrong.

Behaviors previous generations might have described as strict parenting, family obligation, criticism, interference or simply "that's how parents were" may now be described using words such as boundaries, trauma, emotional immaturity, gaslighting or toxicity.

Some people worry we've gone too far.

Others would argue that we're finally giving people language for experiences that were always painful but rarely acknowledged.

I don't think parents have to resolve that cultural debate before they can begin understanding an estrangement.

Instead, we can ask:

What did this experience mean to my child?

That's a very different question from:

Was my child justified in feeling this way?

One invites understanding.

The other invites a trial.

And relationships rarely heal in a courtroom.

Therapy Isn't the Enemy—But Language Can Become a Wall

Another part of this conversation deserves nuance.

Many young adults today are more comfortable talking about mental health, going to therapy and setting boundaries than previous generations were.

I consider much of that progress.

I spent decades in health education. I believe deeply in mental-health awareness and appropriate professional support.

But any language—including therapeutic language—can stop being useful when it becomes a label rather than the beginning of a conversation.

"You're a narcissist."

"You're toxic."

"You're emotionally immature."

"You're a boundary-crosser."

Labels can sometimes help people make sense of their experiences.

They can also flatten incredibly complicated relationships into one description.

The goal shouldn't be to decide which generation has the better vocabulary.

The goal should be to understand what's underneath the words.

Maybe No Contact Is the Clue

One of the principles I use constantly in my work with parents is:

Behavior is often the clue—not the problem.

A teenager's anger may be the clue.

A young adult's avoidance may be the clue.

A child's perfectionism may be the clue.

And perhaps an adult child going no contact can be a clue, too.

That doesn't mean cutting off a parent is always justified.

It doesn't mean no contact is always the healthiest response.

It doesn't mean it needs to be permanent.

And it doesn't mean parents should accept accusations they believe are untrue.

It means that if someone has reached the point where distance feels necessary, there is information in that decision.

Before asking how to make the behavior stop, we might ask what is underneath it.

Pain?

Pressure?

A need for autonomy?

Years of unresolved conflict?

Different memories of the same experiences?

Difficulty tolerating conflict?

A family pattern no one recognized while they were living it?

Sometimes several of those things may be true at once.

The Hardest Part: You Can't Control Reconnection

This is where I often begin with parents whose adult child has gone no contact or significantly reduced contact.

You cannot control whether your adult child responds to your text.

You cannot force them to hear your perspective.

You cannot determine when—or whether—they will be ready to reconnect.

And repeatedly trying to make those things happen can unintentionally create more pressure.

But that doesn't mean you're powerless.

You can examine your part without assuming all the blame.

You can become curious about your child's experience.

You can learn to listen without immediately explaining.

You can recognize patterns you want to change.

You can decide when reaching out may be helpful and when giving space may be more helpful.

You can work on your own grief, fear and urgency.

You can change the way you communicate.

And you can prepare yourself to respond differently if the door opens.

Build the Bridge

I think about parent-adult child estrangement as a bridge.

When an adult child goes no contact, parents understandably want their child to come back across it.

So they call.

They text.

They explain.

They apologize again.

They try harder.

All of it usually comes from love, fear and an enormous desire to repair the relationship.

But sometimes all that effort feels like pressure to the person on the other side.

What if, instead of trying to pull them across the bridge, we worked on our side of it?

Make it sturdier.

Remove some of the pressure.

Become more curious.

Listen differently.

Understand what might make approaching the relationship feel safer.

You can't make another adult cross the bridge.

But you can work on making your side of it safer to approach.

And sometimes, that is where repair begins.

Not with blame.

Not with shame.

Not even with deciding who was right.

With understanding.

And one meaningful step forward.

No blame. No shame. Just FORWARD.

When Your Adult Child Has Pulled Away
If your adult child has gone no contact or significantly reduced contact, you don't have to figure out your next step alone. Learn how parent coaching can help you understand what's happening, reduce pressure, and work on building a safer bridge toward connection. 

Learn About Estranged Parent Coaching →